tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6392901304932532948.post6503082400199356942..comments2023-12-23T05:16:48.469-05:00Comments on Riggs' Nut Straight: last nights 14KRiggstadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09724818580402350984noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6392901304932532948.post-56959420110803800802007-08-26T11:35:00.000-04:002007-08-26T11:35:00.000-04:00I agree that checking would be weak, I understand ...I agree that checking would be weak, I understand that concept. My question is was there a diamond on board? It sucks that the BB had kings there w/ no re-raise preflop. Seems like if you had KK in the BB, and kinda short w/ 8800 already in the pot? wouldnt you want to get it in right there, w/ the possibly of someone having a hand that can call, to double up. I feel that the AQ played it well, but the KK played it horribly. <BR/><BR/>But is checking, the flop on the button to maybe see a fourth diamond or an Ace,or the King, to make a hand, actually a bad play but it cant actually be called a good play..corron10https://www.blogger.com/profile/17424252231196290005noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6392901304932532948.post-52721985496661542702007-08-21T17:26:00.000-04:002007-08-21T17:26:00.000-04:00What else are you going to do here? Check behind?...What else are you going to do here? Check behind? That's weak, and like you said you need those chips out there. It's laughable that UTG raised preflop and checked that flop, too.<BR/><BR/>Though this ain't sayin' much, I'd have played it pretty much the same way. Congrats on cashing!pokerDegenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12726512824315765933noreply@blogger.com